Instructional Design Model

The ADDIE Instructional Design Model: Practical Example

Home » Training Insights » The ADDIE Instructional Design Model: Practical Example

To make theory tangible, we’ll examine an ADDIE instructional design model practical example, demonstrating how the method works in a realistic training scenario from start to finish.

Scenario: Sales Training for New Product Launch

A software company is launching a new enterprise product and needs to train its 150-person sales team quickly and effectively.

Phase 1: Analysis (2 weeks)

Activities:

  • Conducted needs assessment interviews with sales leadership
  • Surveyed sales representatives about current knowledge and challenges
  • Analyzed competitive products and positioning
  • Reviewed product specifications with product management
  • Assessed existing CRM and sales enablement tools
  • Identified constraints (tight timeline, distributed team, limited budget)

Key Findings:

  • Sales team has strong general sales skills but limited technical product knowledge
  • Competitive landscape is complex with multiple positioning scenarios
  • Reps need to articulate value proposition to various buyer personas
  • Team is distributed globally across multiple time zones
  • Two months until product launch
  • Budget: $50,000

Outputs:

  • Learner profile documenting sales team characteristics
  • Task analysis identifying critical sales conversations
  • Learning objectives aligned with sales behaviors
  • Delivery recommendation: blended approach with self-paced eLearning and virtual workshops

Phase 2: Design (3 weeks)

Activities:

  • Defined specific learning objectives for product knowledge, competitive positioning, and sales conversations
  • Designed three-tier learning approach:
    • Tier 1: Self-paced product knowledge modules
    • Tier 2: Virtual workshops for objection handling and demos
    • Tier 3: Ongoing coaching and reinforcement
  • Created assessment strategy including product knowledge quiz, role-play scenarios, and on-the-job observation
  • Outlined content structure: 6 microlearning modules, 2 virtual workshops, 10 scenario-based practice exercises
  • Selected delivery platforms: existing LMS for eLearning, Zoom for virtual workshops
  • Designed storyboards for interactive eLearning modules
  • Planned reinforcement strategy with weekly tip sheets and peer learning groups

Outputs:

  • Detailed learning objectives document
  • Instructional strategy blueprint
  • Content outline for all materials
  • Storyboards for eLearning modules
  • Workshop facilitation guides outline
  • Assessment specifications
  • Project timeline and milestone schedule

Phase 3: Development (5 weeks)

Activities:

  • Wrote scripts for 6 microlearning modules (5-7 minutes each)
  • Developed interactive scenarios for product positioning
  • Created slide decks and facilitator guides for 2 virtual workshops
  • Recorded narration with professional voice talent
  • Designed graphics and product screenshots
  • Built eLearning modules in authoring tool
  • Programmed interactive elements and knowledge checks
  • Configured LMS and uploaded content
  • Developed job aids: competitive comparison sheet, objection handling guide, demo scripts
  • Created assessment instruments including product knowledge quiz and role-play rubrics
  • Conducted alpha testing with 5 sales representatives
  • Revised based on feedback from alpha testing

Outputs:

  • 6 completed eLearning modules uploaded to LMS
  • 2 virtual workshop packages (slides, facilitator guides, participant materials)
  • Product knowledge assessment
  • 10 role-play scenarios with rubrics
  • Job aids and reference materials
  • Tested and functional LMS configuration

Phase 4: Implementation (6 weeks)

Activities:

  • Trained 6 sales managers as workshop facilitators
  • Communicated launch schedule to entire sales team
  • Enrolled all sales reps in LMS and oriented them to platform
  • Launched Tier 1: eLearning modules (4 weeks for completion)
  • Scheduled and delivered Tier 2: 12 virtual workshop sessions (2 weeks)
  • Provided technical support through dedicated help channel
  • Monitored completion rates and engagement daily
  • Sent reminder communications for incomplete modules
  • Facilitated peer learning groups
  • Distributed weekly reinforcement tip sheets
  • Made minor adjustments based on initial feedback (clarified confusing concepts, fixed technical issues)

Outputs:

  • 150 sales reps completed eLearning modules (98% completion rate)
  • 145 reps attended virtual workshops (97% participation)
  • 140 reps passed product knowledge assessment on first attempt (93%)
  • Troubleshooting documentation for common issues
  • Participation and completion data
  • Facilitator feedback and observations

Phase 5: Evaluation (Ongoing)

Formative Evaluation (Throughout):

  • Alpha testing revealed confusing navigation, which was simplified
  • Early participants reported one module was too technical, prompting simplified explanations
  • Virtual workshop feedback led to more time for practice scenarios

Summative Evaluation:

Level 1: Reaction (Immediately after training)

  • Post-training survey: 4.3/5.0 average satisfaction rating
  • 92% found content relevant to their role
  • 88% felt confident to have product conversations
  • Positive comments about microlearning format and interactive scenarios

Level 2: Learning (Immediately after training)

  • 93% passed product knowledge assessment on first attempt
  • Average score: 87%
  • Role-play assessments showed 85% of reps could effectively position product
  • Knowledge retention test at 30 days: 81% average score

Level 3: Behavior (60 days post-launch)

  • Sales managers observed 10% of sales calls
  • 78% of reps effectively incorporated product messaging in client conversations
  • 82% successfully handled common objections using trained techniques
  • 71% delivered effective product demos
  • CRM data showed 85% of reps actively using new sales materials and job aids

Level 4: Results (90 days post-launch)

  • Product achieved 112% of first-quarter sales targets
  • Average deal size exceeded projections by 18%
  • Sales cycle length decreased by 12 days compared to similar past launches
  • Win rate against primary competitor improved from 45% to 58%
  • Customer feedback indicated strong understanding of value proposition
  • ROI calculation: $620,000 revenue attributable to improved sales effectiveness vs. $50,000 training investment = 1,140% ROI

Continuous Improvement Actions:

  • Updated module on competitive positioning based on field feedback about new competitor tactics
  • Added two new role-play scenarios for emerging buyer objections
  • Created advanced module for complex enterprise deals
  • Scheduled quarterly refresher sessions
  • Integrated training data into ongoing sales coaching